top of page
Search

August 2026 - Minaj Jivraj My Take: When Schools Go Silent: The Accountability Crisis in Ontario Education

Aug 18
6 min read

Ontario’s school system cannot credibly claim to prioritize safety while allowing violence to be minimized, inconsistently reported, or hidden from families. Accountability is not just a governance issue; it is a student safety issue, a staff safety issue, and a trust issue that affects the entire school community.[2][3][1]When school boards downplay violence or treat serious incidents as internal public-relations problems, they weaken prevention, distort the true level of risk, and leave parents unable to protect their children effectively. In Ontario, the legal and policy framework already recognizes that violent incidents, child protection concerns, and student harm require reporting and action; the problem is that compliance and communication are not always consistent in practice.[6][7][8][1][2] 


Why accountability matters

School boards are public institutions funded by taxpayers and entrusted with the care of children for most of the school day. That trust creates a duty to report serious incidents honestly, follow provincial procedures, and communicate with families in a way that is meaningful rather than evasive. The issue is not whether schools should disclose private details about other students; the issue is whether they should tell parents what happened, what risk existed, and what was done in response.[8][1][6]Ontario’s Policy/Program Memorandum 120 requires boards to report violent incidents to the Ministry of Education through OnSIS, and it states that all violent incidents on school premises during school-run programs must be reported, regardless of who committed them. The province also maintains reporting forms and safe-school guidance designed to standardize responses to serious student incidents. If a board fails to follow these requirements faithfully, the result is not only a policy failure but a public-safety failure.[1][6][8] 


When violence is minimized

Minimizing violence can happen in several ways: by re-labeling an assault as a minor conflict, by failing to record an incident in the appropriate reporting system, by narrowing what counts as “serious,” or by withholding enough information that families cannot understand the nature of the threat. CBC’s investigation found that under-reporting of student violence persisted despite mandatory reporting rules, showing that official data can understate the extent of harm students experience.[7][2]This matters, because schools and boards use incident data to make decisions about supervision, staffing, behavior plans, threat management, and school climate. If the data is incomplete, then the response is built on a false picture of reality. In practical terms, that means a board can claim improvement while parents, staff, and students are still dealing with assault, intimidation, threats, and fear.[3][2]The issue also affects staff safety. Ontario’s reporting framework is not limited to student discipline; it intersects with workplace violence, occupational health and safety, and the board’s broader duty to protect employees as well as students. A school that normalizes violence is not just unsafe for children; it is unsafe for everyone who works there.[9][1] 


How parents are left in the dark

Parents are often the last to know when a child has been victimized. In some cases, they learn only that “an incident occurred” without being told whether their child was assaulted, threatened, bullied, or exposed to a weapon-related concern. That kind of vague notification may satisfy institutional caution, but it does not satisfy the basic obligation to keep families informed enough to act.[7][8]Ontario guidance recognizes that principals may need to inform parents in bullying and serious incident situations, while still protecting the privacy of other students. That balance is important. Privacy does not mean silence, and it does not justify leaving a victim’s parents without the facts they need to seek medical care, counseling, legal advice, or a safety plan.[10][8]This is exactly where accountability and transparency intersect. A school board that hides behind privacy to avoid scrutiny is not protecting children; it may be protecting itself from criticism. The public record shows that this concern is not hypothetical, because the broader reporting landscape in Ontario has long been criticized for gaps and inconsistencies.[2][7] 


Verified incidents

The following incidents were reported in credible, publicly accessible sources. 


Oshawa-area assault near a high school

In March 2026, Durham police searched for five youths after a student was attacked with a metal weapon near an Oshawa high school. The attack was reported in local news, and the victim suffered injuries serious enough to make the case newsworthy and relevant to school safety discussions.[4] 


Medway High School fights and online threat

CBC reported in November 2021 that multiple fights had taken place at Medway High School and that a threat had been posted to social media. The principal responded by locking students in classrooms while police investigated, illustrating how online rumors and real-world violence can quickly converge in a school setting.[5] 


Toronto school violence report

CBC reported in 2008 that a Toronto school safety report described violence as a citywide issue, not one limited to a single neighborhood. The report highlighted incidents involving guns in schools and showed that violence was not confined to one “problem area,” which is a useful reminder that school violence can affect entire boards and communities.[11] 


Ontario-wide violence increase

In 2025, Global News reported that violent incidents recorded in Ontario schools had risen sharply over the preceding years, with more than 4,400 incidents reported in the 2023-24 year. The report also said the rise had continued over several years, which supports the argument that violence is not a one-off concern but a system-wide challenge.[3] 


CBC investigation into under-reporting

CBC’s 2019 investigation found that under-reporting of student violence persisted and that many incidents were not being captured consistently in official data. The investigation also noted that a large share of surveyed students reported physical assaults before reaching high school, reinforcing the seriousness of the issue.[12][2] 


Why these incidents matter

These incidents matter because they show a pattern, not just isolated events. They demonstrate that violence can occur in school buildings, near schools, and across entire districts, and that online content can amplify fear, confusion, and misinformation if schools do not communicate clearly and promptly.[4][5][3]They also show why families and staff need honest information. If the system undercounts incidents, parents may assume conditions are safer than they really are. If schools delay or soften disclosures, they may unintentionally increase the risk of repeat harm, rumor-driven panic, or loss of trust.[2][7] 


What accountability should include

Real accountability should include accurate reporting, timely parent communication, clear incident classification, and independent oversight when boards fail to comply. It should also include a willingness to treat violence as a serious governance and safety problem, not merely a communications challenge.[6][8][1]A stronger model would require:- Clear rules for when parents must be told what happened.- Better public reporting of violent incidents by board and school.- Routine audits to compare internal incident logs with ministry submissions.- Transparent follow-up when a serious incident occurs.- Consequences when boards fail to report as required.[8][1][2]Ontario already has the basic policy tools. What is missing is consistent implementation and a culture that values truth over reputation management.[1][6] 


Conclusion

School safety cannot be built on secrecy. Ontario’s school boards must be accountable not only for budgets and compliance, but for the real-world safety of students, staff, and families. When violence is minimized or parents are left uninformed, the system fails the very people it is supposed to protect.[3][6][7][1][2]The public record is clear enough to support reform: school violence is real, reporting is uneven, and families often need more information than they are given. Holding school boards accountable is therefore not anti-education; it is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-child.[5][6][1][2][3] 


References


Sources



Minaz Jivraj MSc., C.P.P., C.F.E., C.F.E.I., C.C.F.I.-C., I.C.P.S., C.C.T.P.

Disclaimer:The information provided in this blog/article is for general informational purposes only and reflects the personal opinions of the author. It is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the content, the author makes no representations or warranties about its completeness or suitability for any particular purpose. Readers are encouraged to seek professional legal advice specific to their situation.

 

 
 

Recent Posts

See All

MRJ Security Consultants: Protecting Tomorrow's Leaders Today with consulting, training and security services.

Quick Links

About Us

Services

Contact

Blog

Linkedin

© Copyright 2026 MRJ  Security Consultants - All Rights Reserved

bottom of page